About

Built by engineers in the gap

We spent years watching developers get stuck between reading documentation and writing production-quality code in a new stack. The problem was not effort. It was the absence of specific, timely feedback on real code.

Mission

Close the gap between docs and production

Documentation tells you what a function does. A tutorial shows you a contrived example. Neither tells you how to apply the pattern correctly in a real codebase under real constraints. That translation is where most developer learning breaks down, and where most developers stall when switching stacks.

HackQuest was built to fill that gap. By grading real pull requests and mapping each error to its underlying concept, HackQuest gives developers the kind of feedback that was previously only available from a patient, experienced senior engineer who had time to review your code, explain the why, and track your gaps over time.

Most developers do not have that. We built the tool that serves as that senior reviewer for anyone switching stacks.

15
Supported stacks
2024
Founded
3
Team members
Team

The people behind HackQuest

Kevin Lee, CEO and Co-Founder of HackQuest
Kevin Lee
CEO, Co-Founder

Kevin spent seven years at infrastructure companies building Go and Rust services before co-founding HackQuest. He wrote the original PR grading pipeline and leads product direction.

Alex Chen, CTO and Co-Founder of HackQuest
Alex Chen
CTO, Co-Founder

Alex built large-scale ML training pipelines before co-founding HackQuest. He designed the concept mapping model and leads the AI infrastructure team.

Maya Okonkwo, Head of Product at HackQuest
Maya Okonkwo
Head of Product

Maya led developer tools product teams for six years before joining HackQuest. She shapes the learning experience and drives the adaptive path roadmap.

Story

Why we built this

In 2023, Kevin was leading a backend team that needed to migrate a Python service to Go. Six months in, three experienced Python engineers were still writing Go that looked like Python with different syntax. They were reading the spec, watching the talks, running the tests. They were not getting better fast enough.

The problem was feedback latency. A senior Go engineer would review a PR every two weeks. By then, the pattern had already been applied wrong in five more places. There was no loop tight enough to fix the underlying concept gap before it propagated.

Kevin called Alex. They spent three months building a prototype that graded Go PRs automatically and identified the concept behind each error. The team migrated the rest of the service in eight weeks. They knew they had something worth building for everyone.

Start grading your real code today.

Free tier, no credit card, no fixed syllabus.